Archive for the ‘scott illinois’ Category

can i be put on his health insurance while living together?

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

i currently have no health insurance. he’s enlisted in Air Force and starting feb. 18 he is PCSing to Scott AFB illinois and i am going with him so we will be living together. is there something to do so i have insurance?
i already graduated college so no school for me
rejectedsoul idk what your talking about.
he’s an e4 going to be an e5 in july. meaning he has 3 stripes now, will get his 4th in july.
i know all that stuff about getting on base..and he wants to live off base. he already lives off base in nj so i dont think some of you people know what youre talking about. and yes im living in temp base housing – he has permission from his commander at scott. geez

Yes there is, all you have to say is "I do." You have to be married to qualify for health insurance. Another thing you can do is join the military.

Help me with my business law homework!?

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

i’m studying for a test coming up and was wondering if anyone can help me with a few of the sample questions it gave me. theres alot of them..i just need help on 5 of them….

1)1. In a single sentence, summarize the rule of law in the Gideon v. Wainwright case as it was decided by the United States Supreme Court.

2)State how the U.S. Supreme Court opinion in the Scott v. illinois case changed the rule of law stated in the Gideon opinion.

3)Gideon argued that under the double jeopardy provision he could not be tried again after the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled in his favor. Why was he incorrect?

4)Four of the U.S. Supreme Court justices who decided the Argersinger v. Hamlin case also decided Gideon v. Wainwright. Name two of the four justices who heard both cases.

5)First, name the United States Supreme Court justice who wrote the decision for the Court in the Gideon case. Second, what was his role in the Betts decision?

Thanks in advance!!

This isn’t business law. This is basic US Constitutional law.

Depending on the college, this would be covered in Con Law (covering all of the constitutional law) or in Con law 2 (covering the bill of rights).

either way, see my answer earlier. Email me your proposed answers, and I can critique you and tutor you if you want. but I won’t do your homework for you. You won’t learn anything that way, but I will help you learn the course material.

PLEASE help me with my government/law homework. I need help please!!!!!!!?

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

i’m studying for a test coming up and was wondering if anyone can help me with a few of the sample questions it gave me. theres alot of them..i just need help on 5 of them….

1)1. In a single sentence, summarize the rule of law in the Gideon v. Wainwright case as it was decided by the United States Supreme Court.

2)State how the U.S. Supreme Court opinion in the Scott v. illinois case changed the rule of law stated in the Gideon opinion.

3)Gideon argued that under the double jeopardy provision he could not be tried again after the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled in his favor. Why was he incorrect?

4)Four of the U.S. Supreme Court justices who decided the Argersinger v. Hamlin case also decided Gideon v. Wainwright. Name two of the four justices who heard both cases.

5)First, name the United States Supreme Court justice who wrote the decision for the Court in the Gideon case. Second, what was his role in the Betts decision?

Thanks in advance!!
this isnt homework, its sample questions for a midterm. I’m taking this class online and i’m getting a huge head ach. Just needed some help. goodness.

I’ll tell you these answers if you help me with my contracts reading ;o) yeah, i didn’t think so

I’ll help you a little…

Gideon:
The petitioner brought habeas corpus proceedings against the Director of the Division of Corrections. The Florida Supreme Court, 135 So.2d 746, denied all relief, and the petitioner brought certiorari. The United States Supreme Court, Mr. Justice Black, held that the Sixth Amendment to the federal Constitution providing that in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy right to assistance of counsel for his defense is made obligatory on the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, and that an indigent defendant in a criminal prosecution in a state court has the right to have counsel appointed for him.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded to Florida Supreme Court for further action.

a likely looking website: http://www.landmarkcases.org/gideon/home.html

and:
http://www.answers.com/topic/gideon-v-wainwright

As much as I love doing your homework, I have my own… sorry… too tired to do extra

Now that Scott Brown has been seated in the Senate, when will Burris be ejected?

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/1…
Burris Becomes a Key Player on Health Care
Shunned illinois Senator Makes Waves for Saying He Won’t Vote for Bill Without Public Option
"It works this way: Burris stays mum about any bitterness he may feel about his reception, and he gets Obama’s Senate seat for two years. Democrats seat him, don’t speak of him, and get his loyal vote at a time when all 58 Democrats and two independents must vote together to prevent Republican filibusters. "

There is still an "ongoing" Senate ethics investigation of Burris. The only reason Burris is still in the Senate is that the head of the Senate ethics committee is Barbie Boxer (D CA), who is intentionally postponing the investigation purely for partisan political reasons.

Now that the Democrats have lost their fillibuster proof majority, why do they need Burris around anymore?

Or has the corruption of Burris gaining his seat paled in comparison to the corruption of the entire Obama administration, so he just seems to fit in with his surroundings now?

Burris won’t go away until after the election.

Now that Scott Brown has been seated in the Senate, will Burris be ejected?

Friday, March 19th, 2010

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/1…
Burris Becomes a Key Player on Health Care
Shunned illinois Senator Makes Waves for Saying He Won’t Vote for Bill Without Public Option
"It works this way: Burris stays mum about any bitterness he may feel about his reception, and he gets Obama’s Senate seat for two years. Democrats seat him, don’t speak of him, and get his loyal vote at a time when all 58 Democrats and two independents must vote together to prevent Republican filibusters. "

There is still an "ongoing" Senate ethics investigation of Burris. The only reason Burris is still in the Senate is that the head of the Senate ethics committee is Barbie Boxer (D CA), who is intentionally postponing the investigation purely for partisan political reasons.

Now that the Democrats have lost their fillibuster proof majority, why do they need Burris around anymore?

Or has the corruption of Burris gaining his seat paled in comparison to the corruption of the entire Obama administration, so he just seems to fit in with his surroundings now?

Burris has voted the strict Democrat party line. He is no threat to Reid or Obama. He did not live up to his pledge regarding the need for the public option. The guy is very easy to buy off. From the perspective of Reid and Obama, Burris is the perfect Senator: they can hold the prospect of kicking him out over his head to insure his cooperation. A year from now he will be gone.

Can you believe that Blago is getting off scott free? Your thoughts?

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – The illinois Supreme Court on Wednesday denied an effort to remove Gov. Rod Blagojevich, rejecting what could have been the quickest way to force the Democrat from office. Blagojevich’s lawyer, meanwhile, said the governor would not appoint someone to fill Barack Obama’s vacant U.S. Senate seat, potentially answering one of the key questions surrounding the scandal. Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081218/ap_on_re_us/illinois_governor;_ylt=AueilPjY_NDANdMeEgpw.zrZn414

Edit:

Federal wiretaps recorded Blagojevich talking about selling or trading Obama’s Senate seat, but Genson told the House committee that the words do not amount to illegal actions.

He called the wiretaps "two months of somebody who obviously likes to talk a lot, but two months of nothing getting done."

"There’s no evidence that anyone ever asked anybody for anything with regard to that (U.S. Senate) seat," Genson added.

Genson said it would be "frankly illegal" for the committee to base an impeachment recommendation on the criminal complaint against Blagojevich."

( o _ 0 ) Dude is corrupt plain and simple. What about conspiracy? Can they at least get him on conspiracy charges? What about unpaid parking tickets? Jay walking? Shop lifting? Indecent exposure? Something?!? This guy is so bad for Illinois and he’s gonna walk away from it all "Teflon Don" style. I can’t stand corrupt politicians! ( o _ 0 ) !@##$%#!*?!

Wow…unbelievable….if Obama was in any way connected they would be saying hang ‘em and impeach Obama…I guess if they cant get him no one wants to be bothered…

is it true you can’t hit a man in a uniform?

Monday, March 15th, 2010

I know that is a dumb question… but I had this friend who claimed he worked in CAP and practically snapped on me every time I jokingly hit him. I don’t know anything about the military, so I was wondering if it is true. Also, where is the nearest Air Force Reserves base in illinois besides Scott? Where can I find articles about the Reserves responding to Hurricane Katrina? Thanks

I know if you hit a Soldier and they press charges, the military can come after you for destruction of government property, or attempted atleast.

Obama has kept us safe from terrorists for 9 months?

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

Grr. Thanks Scott. Wikipedia had a very misleading intro statement.

"He served as the junior United States Senator from illinois from January 2005 until he resigned after his election to the presidency in November 2008."

I’ll be back in two months.
And Bush had a terrorist attack after only his first 8 months?

January 20, 2009 puts the Obama presidency at 7 months 11 days.

Are there any places to skimboard near St. Louis?

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Im looking for a place to skimboard near St. louis wether it be on the river or another body of water that isn’t to far from St. Louis. I live on Scott AFB in illinois which is about 25 minutes from St. Louis.

There are some sand bars in the river that work well. Just gotta find em

Where is a good base to be stationed at on this Dream Sheet?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

My boyfriend just sent me his "Dream Sheet" from basic yesterday. So I’m very curious to hear about everyones interactions with these bases. I want to know about the areas around the bases, the size of the bases, the services at the bases, and what the atmosphere is like on the bases. But any other information is welcome. I know obviously he won’t be choosing but I’m just curious to know about all of these places.

1.Peterson Colorado
2.McConnell Kansas
3.Pope North Carolina
4.Hill Utah
5.MacDill Florida
6.Travis California
7.Seymour Johnson Nor Carolina
8.Scott illinois

My nephew loves Peterson and a good friend of mine loves MacDill. I never got stationed at a base on my dream sheet until I went to a remote base. I was given my third choice which wasn’t too good. That base no longer exists.

If your boyfriend is Security Forces, he will get screwed on his choice of bases but it’s a fun career field. He will go to a missile or bomber base and then get deployed to SWA.

Avoid Scott (small-boring-headquarters base), McConnel (cold-remote), and Hill (cold-remote). Bases near larger cities are more fun, but if you like hunting and fishing, there are many bases that could satisfy you.